← All Articles Sellers · 5 min read

Negotiating Price After a Building and Pest Inspection in Brisbane

What buyers do with inspection reports, what you are obligated to fix versus what is negotiable, and how to respond when a buyer uses the inspection to push your price down.

Building and pest inspections are a standard part of private treaty sales in Queensland. Buyers contracting subject to inspection have the right to commission a report and, depending on what it finds, request a price adjustment or walk away. For sellers, understanding how this stage works, what you must respond to and what you can hold firm on, is important for managing the outcome of a sale you have already committed significant effort to achieving.

What buyers do with inspection reports

A building and pest report will almost always identify something. Older homes in Brisbane's inner east, which make up the majority of the housing stock, routinely produce reports with multiple items. Minor maintenance issues, some evidence of past termite activity that has been treated, slightly weathered external timbers, and older roof plumbing are common findings in Queenslanders and character homes. A report finding issues does not mean the property is in poor condition. It means it is a property that has been lived in.

Buyers use reports in different ways. Some use them as genuine due diligence tools to understand the true condition of what they are buying and to form a realistic view of future maintenance costs. Others use them as a negotiating instrument, presenting a list of items to justify a price reduction that was always their intention. The experienced agents in this market can read quickly which category a buyer falls into, which is important for how you respond.

What you are obligated to fix in Queensland

In Queensland, sellers are not generally obligated to fix building defects identified in a buyer's inspection report as a condition of completing the sale. The standard REIQ contract does not require the seller to repair items found in a post-contract inspection. What sellers are required to do is disclose known defects on the property disclosure statement before contract, and the property must be in the same condition at settlement as at contract, fair wear and tear excepted.

This matters because buyers sometimes present inspection findings as though the seller is legally required to either fix the issues or reduce the price. That is not how Queensland property law works under a standard contract. The inspection clause gives buyers the right to terminate or negotiate, but it does not impose a repair obligation on sellers. Your obligation is to the condition at contract date, not to rectify every item a building inspector flags.

Where things become more complex is if the inspection reveals an undisclosed defect that the seller was aware of but did not disclose. If a seller knew about active termite activity, significant structural movement, or a water ingress issue and did not include it on the disclosure statement, that creates potential liability that is a separate and more serious matter than a routine post-inspection negotiation.

How to respond to a price reduction request

When a buyer sends through an inspection report with a list of items and a request to reduce the price, the first step is to read the report carefully with your agent rather than reacting immediately. Not every flagged item justifies a price adjustment. Inspectors are required to report on anything that falls outside normal expected condition, which often includes maintenance items that are ordinary for the age and type of the home. A buyer using the report to request $30,000 off based on items that a competent handyman could address for $3,000 is using the report instrumentally, not genuinely.

The appropriate response depends on the nature of the items. For significant structural issues that were not evident at the time of contract, a genuine negotiation about what remedy is reasonable is warranted. For routine maintenance items in an older home that was priced and presented transparently, your position can reasonably be that the property was priced with its age and condition reflected, and the inspection findings do not change the agreed value.

Your agent should be handling this conversation directly with the buyer's agent. The negotiation is most effective when framed around comparable sales data rather than the report itself. If the property is priced fairly for its condition relative to what has sold, that is your strongest position. If the report reveals something material that changes the buyer's view of value, a targeted adjustment on the specific issue rather than a broad discount on the total price is usually the better approach for both parties.

When to hold firm

Sellers who capitulate immediately to every inspection-based price request train buyers to ask. If the property was priced correctly for its condition, the inspection findings do not change the value of comparable sales. Holding firm is entirely reasonable when the reported items are ordinary for the property type and age, when you have comparable evidence to support your position, and when you have other buyer interest or a strong campaign behind you.

The time to be more flexible is when the report reveals something significant that was not apparent at inspection, when your buyer is genuinely committed and the alternative is relisting, and when the gap between what the buyer is asking and what the repair cost actually represents is narrow enough that the commercial case for conceding is clear.

When to let the buyer walk

Not every negotiation should be saved. If a buyer is using the inspection clause in bad faith to achieve a price they should have bid at during the campaign, letting them exercise their termination right and returning to market is sometimes the right call. Particularly in a market where genuine buyer demand is present, a seller who holds their price and relists after a termination may find another buyer at the original price within a short campaign period.

Your agent's read on the market at that point matters enormously. If competing listings are building up and buyer demand is softening, the calculus is different. The decision to hold or concede should be based on realistic assessment of current market conditions, not emotion about the specific buyer or frustration at the inspection process itself.