← All Articles Sellers · 9 min read

When a Building and Pest Inspection Finds Defects: How Brisbane Sellers Should Respond

A building and pest report rarely kills a deal. Handled well, it reshapes the negotiation. Here is how Brisbane sellers separate genuine issues from tactical ones, and how to respond to keep the sale together.

Most residential contracts in Queensland are signed subject to a satisfactory building and pest inspection. The inspector attends within the agreed inspection period, walks the property, and produces a report. If that report identifies issues, the buyer's solicitor will write to the seller's solicitor setting out the buyer's position. What happens next is a negotiation that reshapes the deal, and in the majority of cases the sale survives. How the seller responds in the 48 to 72 hours after the report lands is usually what determines whether the negotiation produces a reasonable outcome or breaks down.

Sellers who panic and concede immediately leave money on the table. Sellers who dismiss the report and refuse to engage risk losing the buyer. The right response is measured, data-led, and based on a careful reading of what the report actually says and what the buyer is actually asking for.

The typical sequence

The buyer signs a contract subject to a satisfactory building and pest inspection, usually with a condition period of seven to fourteen days. The buyer engages a licensed inspector (sometimes two, one for building and one for pest), and the inspection is completed within that window. The inspector issues a written report, often 30 to 60 pages, describing the condition of the property room by room, along with exterior, roof, subfloor, and pest observations.

The buyer reviews the report, usually with their solicitor and occasionally with a contractor for specific items. The buyer's solicitor then writes to the seller's solicitor setting out the buyer's position: terminate, continue at the current price with specific repairs or concessions, or continue at a reduced price that reflects the cost of the identified issues. The seller's solicitor passes this to the seller, and the negotiation begins.

The three possible buyer positions

Position one is termination under the building and pest condition. This is the most common threat and the least common actual outcome. Genuine termination usually happens when the report reveals a significant undisclosed defect that fundamentally changes the buyer's view of the property, such as serious structural movement, extensive active termite damage, or major compliance failures.

Position two is to continue at the current price but with the issue addressed before settlement. This can mean the seller agreeing to complete specific repairs, replace a failing system (hot water unit, air conditioning unit, electrical fault), or obtain a compliance certificate (smoke alarms, pool safety, electrical). Position three is to continue at a reduced price that reflects the cost of the identified issues, which is often the cleanest path to a settled deal.

What the seller should do first

Read the report carefully, all of it, before responding. Inspection reports frequently flag minor, expected, and cosmetic issues alongside genuine defects. A report listing 40 items is not unusual, but 35 of those might be normal wear-and-tear for a 50-year-old home, three might be maintenance items any buyer should expect to address, and only two might be genuine issues that warrant discussion.

Resist the urge to respond emotionally. A long report can feel like an attack on the property, particularly for sellers with a personal attachment to the home. Read it as the professional document it is, separate the categorised issues (major structural, major safety, minor defect, maintenance), and identify which items the buyer is likely to raise in negotiation. Then engage with the report on its merits.

When to push back on the report

Push back is appropriate when the report lists items that are normal wear for the age and style of the property, items that were plainly visible at inspection and accepted by the buyer at contract (a scratched floorboard, a chipped benchtop, a lawn that needs work), or items where the inspector's recommendation is disproportionate to the finding (for example, a recommendation to replace the entire roof on the basis of two displaced tiles).

Sellers can fairly resist claims that these justify termination or material price reductions. The response is a letter from the seller's solicitor that addresses each item directly, distinguishes between what is a genuine defect and what is cosmetic or expected wear, and offers a position that reflects the reality of the property. A firm, data-led response tends to move the negotiation onto the substantive issues.

When to accept the claim

Acceptance is appropriate in two scenarios. The first is where the report identifies a significant defect that the seller knew about and did not disclose. The seller's position in that scenario is weak, both commercially and legally, and attempting to hold the line invites termination or a dispute. Acceptance, in the form of a price reduction or a repair obligation, is usually a better outcome than trying to litigate.

The second is where the report identifies a significant defect that neither the seller nor the buyer knew about. This can genuinely happen with older properties: concealed structural movement, subfloor damage, a failing retaining wall, or an issue only visible from the roof cavity. In this scenario, the seller should obtain an independent quote for the repair or replacement, review it alongside the inspector's description, and negotiate on the basis of real costs rather than the buyer's opening position.

The three main negotiation outcomes

The first outcome is a price reduction. This is usually the cleanest and fastest, and it is what most experienced buyers and sellers prefer. The parties agree on a figure that reflects the cost of the issues, the contract is formally varied to record the new price, and the sale proceeds to settlement at the revised amount. Price reductions should be documented in a written variation signed by both parties, not agreed verbally.

The second outcome is for the seller to repair before settlement. This is viable for defined, finite repairs that can be completed cleanly before the settlement date, such as replacing a hot water system, rectifying a plumbing leak, or installing compliant smoke alarms. The risks are delay (if the tradesperson is unavailable), quality (if the buyer is not satisfied with the work), and documentation (if the parties disagree about what was meant to be done). Price reductions are usually preferable for anything complex.

The third outcome is no change: the buyer continues at the contract price. This happens when the defects are minor, the market is active, and the buyer genuinely wants the property. Sellers should not assume this is impossible. In strong markets, buyers frequently accept properties as-is rather than risk losing them.

What sellers should not do

Do not dismiss the buyer's concerns without reviewing the report. Buyers read dismissal as disrespect, and it damages the trust needed to close a deal. Do not over-concede in the first response. Buyers will often ask for more than they expect to receive, and accepting the opening position uncritically costs thousands of dollars that could have been defended with a measured response.

Do not commit to repairs verbally or through a handshake with the agent. Every commitment should be documented in a written variation prepared by the seller's solicitor and signed by both parties. Verbal commitments lead to disputes about scope, quality, and timing, and they are difficult to enforce if the deal goes sideways. Do not rush. A 48-hour delay to obtain a contractor's quote or a second opinion almost always produces a better outcome than an emotional same-day response.

When the buyer is using the report as a pricing lever

A common negotiation tactic is to seize on every report finding and use it to push for a discount, often well beyond the genuine cost of the issues. This is negotiation, not bad faith, and sellers should treat it as such. The right response is to ask for a contractor's quote for the items the buyer claims are material, compare it to the seller's own assessment, and offer a discount that reflects legitimate costs rather than inflated estimates.

The discipline is to separate the buyer's opening position from what the buyer would actually accept. Most buyers who ask for $30,000 will settle for $10,000 if the seller responds with a measured, evidence-based counter. Sellers who accept the $30,000 opening position without negotiation are leaving money on the table.

The walkaway threshold

Every seller has a walkaway threshold: a point at which the buyer's demands exceed what the seller is willing to give. Knowing that threshold in advance (ideally before the inspection happens) is important. It prevents emotional decisions in the 48-hour window after the report arrives.

If the buyer's demands exceed the genuine cost of the issues, the seller can refuse and accept the risk of termination. In a hot market, a refused buyer is often replaced by a backup offer at or near the original price. In a slow market, the pragmatic choice is usually to accept the discount and proceed, because the next buyer may produce the same conversation at a lower starting price. The seller's decision should be informed by current market conditions, the quality of the buyer's offer, and the seller's own timeline.

What happens if the buyer terminates

If the buyer validly terminates under the building and pest condition, the buyer's deposit is returned in full. The seller retains any marketing costs already incurred but does not receive damages, because the termination is permitted by the contract. The property goes back to market.

The best protection against termination is preparation. Sellers with backup offers in hand, or a queue of interested buyers who missed out the first time, can move quickly to re-engage the market without a significant loss of momentum. Sellers who assumed the first contract was done and let the backup pool go cold face a harder restart. This is one of the reasons experienced agents encourage sellers to keep backup buyers warm even after a contract is signed, until the conditions have lapsed.

The prepared seller

The most effective protection against a hostile building and pest negotiation is to run a pre-sale inspection before listing. For a cost of $500 to $800, a seller can identify the issues that are likely to appear on a buyer's report and decide whether to repair them, disclose them, or price them into the campaign. This removes surprise from the deal, strengthens the seller's negotiating position (because any issue raised by the buyer has already been considered and accounted for), and often shortens the condition period because the buyer's inspector has less to find.

Pre-sale inspections are not common in Brisbane but they are standard practice in some other markets and they consistently produce better outcomes. For properties with obvious age, renovation history, or subfloor concerns, a pre-sale inspection is almost always a worthwhile investment.

The practical framework

Every building and pest report is negotiable, but not every finding is a concession. The seller's job is to separate genuine issues from tactical ones, respond with data and documentation rather than emotion, and hold firm on items that do not genuinely justify a price change. Handled well, most reports do not kill deals. They reshape them.

The sellers who produce the best outcomes are calm, informed, and well-advised. They read the full report, obtain independent quotes where needed, respond promptly but not reactively, document every agreement in writing, and know their walkaway number before the negotiation begins. Buyers who encounter that kind of seller usually settle reasonably. Buyers who encounter emotional, reactive sellers often extract more than they should.